Friday, April 27, 2012

Thoughts about gt220 and HD4670 ?

I am gonna get a new graphic card. the question is gt220 or hd4670

they are both 1GB DDR3

and I am gonna play games on my plasma which has a max resolution of 1280 x 720.

I think|||If I were you I'd still try to get at least a 250GTS card for the 256bit, if not a 260GTX. Playing games in 128bit is so unsatisfying to the eyes. If you try to try your max resolution with a 4670 you are going to end up turning the settings down so low that images are going to look like a watercolor world, say in Crysis or other action games. That is where looking at benchmarks scores really fool people. Most benchmark scores are based on systems being run through benchmark tools over and over tweaking down every last setting to get the cards best FPS possible. What we as consumers cannot see is the actual image quality after the bench or game was tweaked to get the max FPS...

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.as…

This GTS250 is a very powerful card for the price and has 1gig of DDR3. It doesn't really take a huge PSU for it, and comes with it's own pigtail for hooking it up to 2 4pin molex connectors, for it's power. Just pop it in and go...|||4670 is better

http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.a…

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best…



GT240 is better than 4670 and 9600 GT, but costs $90 - the same price as the 9800 GT and is slower than the 9800 GT.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gefo…|||The 4670 is Better. If you can wait until the Palit AMP GT240 DDR5 comes down in price then that would be better than the 4670 and is easier to scale to the TV screen, the ATI cards are a bit of a pain when setting up with a HD TV.

No comments:

Post a Comment